Network Interview System and Interview Method Thereof

ABSTRACT

A method of performing a network interview includes a questioner providing a question set with respect to a designated interviewee or a designated event. The questioner uploads the question set to a network in order to collect the support from a plurality of network users. When the question set receives the support of over a predetermined number of network users, the status of the question set becomes one which can be used in an interview. Afterwards at least one qualified interviewer would be given the right to conduct an interview. The at least one interviewer asks the designated interviewee or covers the designated event by a plurality of questions listed in the question set . The at least one interviewer uploads the responses of the interview to the network. The questioner receives the responses from the network.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention illustrates a network interview system andinterview method, and more particularly, the network interview withrespect to a question set provided from network users.

2. Description of the Prior Art

With the generalization of the Internet, various information and datacan be rapidly transmitted to network users. For example, Internet newsand Internet television provide an immediate service that network userscan acquire up-to-date information at any time instead of TV schedulebeing shown at a specific time interval. Nowadays, the Internetfacilitates rapid and real-time information transmission. The Internetintegration with social networks establishes an information sharingservice. Some network users having expertise or skill in particularsubject can share their knowledge and experience with other networkusers through the Internet. In other words, each network user would beregarded as a knowledge provider or knowledge recipient. By sharinginformation with other person, new knowledge or creativity will begradually developed.

Since the network provides a convenient method for exchanging knowledgeand information sharing service, the network has been already applied tovarious interview systems. Ina general interview system, the interviewercollects attitude information and opinions of interviewee by aconversation or discussion, such as using a telephone interview. Theinterview questions are designed in forms of three categories, includinginterview with structured-based questions, unstructured-based questions,and semi-structured-based questions. Specifically, when the interviewuses unstructured-based questions, no pre-determined question is askedfrom the interviewer. The argument or subject of interview may bechanged since the interviewer has some accidental or unexpected ideas.Thus, since the interview data is difficult to analyze, results of theinterview using unstructured-based questions is of less interest inpractice among these three categories of interview questions. When theinterview uses structured-based or semi-structured based questions, allquestions are pre-determined by the interviewer. In other words, theinterviewer asks the pre-determined questions to the interviewee.Specifically, the interview data of the interview using structured-basedor semi-structured based questions can be easy to record and analyze sothat these two interview methods become two standardized interviewmethods in practice.

However, in a conventional network interview method by usingstructured-based or semi-structured based questions, the interviewquestions are generated from a large question set. The network userselect the appropriate questions as the interview questions from thelarge question set. The mechanism for electing interview questionsdepend on at least one popularity value, such as number of like clicksor number of dislike clicks. Thus, some network users or opponents mayuse certain unexpected methods to obstruct the interview questions to bepublished. Besides, the interview questions generated by election in aconventional network interview may be irrelevant or have lowcorrelations. When the interview asks the interview questions generatedby election to the interviewee, in-depth interview is difficult toachieve.

Thus, it is important to develop a network interview method whichsatisfies the following issues. First, the network interview method canchoose appropriate interview questions. Second, the network interviewmethod is designed to avoid some opponents obstructing the interviewquestions to be published. Third, the interviewer can conduct anin-depth interview.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In an embodiment of the present invention, a method of performing anetwork interview is disclosed. The method includes a questionerproviding a question set associating to at least one designatedinterviewee and/or at least one designated event, the questionerpublishing the question set to a network in order to collect the supportfrom a plurality of network users, when the question set receives thesupport from over a predetermined number of network users, changing astatus of the question set to one which can be used in an interview,giving at least one qualified interviewer the right to conduct theinterview, the at least one interviewer asking the at least onedesignated interviewee or covering the at least one designated eventaccording to a plurality of questions listed in the question set, the atleast one interviewer transmitting a response data of the interview tothe network, and the questioner receiving the response data of theinterview from the network.

In another embodiment of the present invention, a network interviewsystem is disclosed. The system includes a questioner interface fortransmitting a question set associating to at least one designatedinterviewee and/or at least one designated event provided from aquestioner, an interviewer interface for transmitting data of at leastone interviewer, a database for saving data, and a network serverconnected to the questioner interface and the interviewer interface,wherein the questioner provides the question set to the network serverthrough the questioner interface, the network server saves the questionset to the database and publishes the question set to a network in orderto collect the support from a plurality of network users, when thequestion set receives the support from over a predetermined number ofnetwork users, the network server changes the status of the question setto one which can be used in an interview, at least one qualifiedinterviewer is given the right to conduct the interview, the at leastone interviewer asks the at least one designated interviewee or coveringthe at least one designated event according to a plurality of questionslisted in the question set, the at least one interviewer transmits aresponse data of the interview to the network server, the network serversaves the response data of the interview to the database, and thenetwork server transmits the response data of the interview to thequestioner through the questioner interface.

These and other objectives of the present invention will no doubt becomeobvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after reading thefollowing detailed description of the preferred embodiment that isillustrated in the various figures and drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a network interview system according to anembodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 illustrates the flow chart of network interview method in FIG. 1according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 illustrates the flowchart of at least one network user desired tobe at least one interviewer in FIG. 1 according to an embodiment of thepresent invention.

FIG. 4 illustrates the flow chart of a grading evaluation process inFIG. 1 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of another network interview system accordingto an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 illustrates the flow chart of profit allocation in FIG. 5according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 illustrates the flow chart of another network interview methodaccording to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8 illustrates the flow chart of a method for improving thereliability of the interview according to an embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 9 illustrates the flow chart of another method for improving thereliability of the interview according to an embodiment of the presentinvention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a network interview system 100 according toan embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the networkinterview system 100 includes a questioner interface 12, an interviewerinterface 13, a database 11, and a network server 10. The questionerinterface 12 is used for receiving a question set provided from aquestioner. The interviewer interface 13 is used for transmitting thequestion set to the interviewer and receiving response data of theinterview from the interviewer. The database 11 is used for saving data.The network server 10 is connected to questioner interface 12, theinterviewer interface 13, and the database 11. In the embodiment, thequestioner interface 12 and the interviewer interface 13 can be twointerfaces respectively disposed to two different computers. Thedatabase 11 includes data of all members of the network interview system100, data of network news, data of interviewers, and data ofquestioners. The network server 10 can be connected to an open-accessnetwork, such as cloud networking server, blade server, or networkstation. The method for operating the network interview system 100 isdetailed as follows.

FIG. 2 illustrates the flow chart of the network interview method inFIG. 1 according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown inFIG. 2, the network interview method includes 7 steps, as step S101 tostep S107, as

-   step S101: a questioner providing a question set associating to at    least one designated interviewee and/or at least one designated    event;-   step S102: the questioner publishing the question set to a network    in order to collect the support from a plurality of network users;-   step S103: when the question set receives the support from over a    predetermined number of network users, changing a status of the    question set to one which can be used in an interview;-   step S104: giving at least one qualified interviewer the right to    conduct the interview;-   step S105: the at least one interviewer asking the at least one    designated interviewee or covering the at least one designated event    according to a plurality of questions listed in the question set;-   step S106: the at least one interviewer transmitting a response data    of the interview to the network; and-   step S107: the questioner receiving the response data of the    interview from the network.

For presentation simplicity, an example is introduced for illustratingthe method of network interview through step S101 to S107. It is assumedthat the network users receive the data of the interview from networknews. Specifically, the data of the interview includes data of theinterviewer (i.e., for example, a reporter) and data of the interviewee.However, the network users think that the questions that the intervieweris asking to the interviewee are irrelevant to the questions they desireto ask. Thus, the network users want to publish the new questions theydesire to ask by using network in order to re-ask to interviewee. Bydoing so, network users have to become a member of network interviewsystem 100. The network interview system 100 saves the data of allmembers to the database 11. The method for becoming the member ofnetwork interview system 100 can use the login process in a socialnetwork account. For example, a user can join using their membership ofFacebook or Renren social networks. Users without a social networkaccount can provide additional personal data for becoming the member ofnetwork interview system 100. In step S101, the questioner integratesthe appropriate question set to be published. In step S102, thequestioner publishes the question set to the network in order to collectthe support from network users. When network server 10 receives thequestion set provided by the questioner, the question set is saved tothe questioner data cluster of the database 11. In addition, the networkserver 10 provides the rights of modification for adjusting thedescription and the quantity of questions by the member. In theembodiment, the questions of the question set provided by the questionerassociates to at least one designated interviewee. For example, thequestioner wants to publish the questions associating public security.The questioner can designate a professional researcher or a professor torespond to the questions. By doing so, the interviewed result isobjective and professional. The questions of the question set canassociate with at least one designated event. For example, thequestioner wants to get the information of travel sites, or theinformation of a commodity price in some specific countries. After thequestion set is published to the network by the questioner, thequestioner can find the people to support the question set from thefriends of social network, the friends of blog, or the friends of chatroom. In the embodiment, the rate of support can be any positivepopularity, such as number of “likes” in Facebook, YouTube, or Twitter.When the question set receives the support from over a predeterminednumber of network users (i.e., for example, over 1000 supports), thenetwork server 10 changes a status of question set to one which can beused in an interview in step S103. When the status of question set ischanged to one which can be used in an interview, the network server 10gives at least one qualified interviewer the right to conduct theinterview through the interviewer interface 13. The method of how to bethe interviewer and how to decide a qualified interviewer areillustrated later. After at least one qualified interviewer has theright to conduct the interview, in step S105, the at least oneinterviewer asks the at least one designated interviewee or covering theat least one designated event according to a plurality of questionslisted in the question set. In step S106, the at least one interviewertransmits the response data of the interview to the network.Specifically, the response data of the interview may include an audiorecording file, a video file, interviewed images, and the response fileof interviewee. After the network server 10 receives the response dataof the interview, the response data of the interview is saved to thedatabase 11. Then, the network server 10 transmits back the responsedata of the interview to the questioner through the questioner interface12. In the embodiment, to ensure the response data of the interview isvalid and authentic, the network interview system 100 can verify acorrection and validity of interviewer identity by sending a shortmessage to the smart phone. If the network interview system 100successfully identifies and verifies the interviewer, the networkinterview system 100 allows that the response data of the interview canbe transmitted back to the network. In addition, in step S106, if theresponse data of the interview is modified by the interviewer, allmodifications are saved by the network interview system 100. By doingso, the objectivity of the interview can be improved.

Further, when the questioner provides the question set, the questionercan select several preferred interviewers from the list of interviewersin the database. Then, the questioner sends an invitation for aninterview to the preferred interviewers so that the question set can betransmitted to the appropriate interviewers immediately. By doing so,the process of interview can be progressed smoothly.

In the following, the method of how to be an interviewer and how todecide a qualified interviewer are illustrated.

FIG. 3 illustrates the flowchart of at least one network user desired tobe at least one interviewer according to the present invention. As shownin FIG. 3, the method of network user desired to be the interviewerincludes two sub-processes. The first sub-process includes step S201,step S202, step S203, step S204, and step S207, as follows.

-   step S201: receiving a request from at least one network user    desiring to be the at least one interviewer;-   step S202: determining if the member account of the at least one    network user is activated through a social network;-   step S203: verifying correction and validity of user identity of the    at least one network user in the social network;-   step S204: verifying the number of friends or number of posts of the    at least one network user in the social network; and-   step S207: when the at least one network user in the social network    satisfies a predetermined rule, allowing the request from at least    one network user desiring to be the at least one interviewer.

In the first sub-process, the network user desiring to be theinterviewer has to send a request to network interview system 100. Instep S201, the network interview system 100 receives the request from atleast one network user desiring to be the at least one interviewer. Thenetwork interview system 100 then determines if the member account ofthe at least one network user is activated through a social network instep S202. If the member account is activated through a social network,the network interview system 100 verifies correction and validity ofuser identity of the at least one network user in the social network instep S203. Specifically, user identity verification can avoid someadverse accounts such as an advertising account or virus account. Whenthe user identity of the at least one network user is successfullyverified, the network interview system 100 further verifies the numberof friends or the number of posts of the at least one network user inthe social network. Particularly, verifying number of friends or numberof posts in the social network can avoid some inactive accounts. Afterthe user identity is successfully verified (or satisfies a predeterminedcheck rules) through step S203 and step S204, the network interviewsystem 100 allows the request from at least one network user desiring tobe the at least one interviewer. In addition, to ensure the authenticityof the user account, the network interview system 100 can further verifya correction and validity by sending a short message to the smart phoneof applicants. If the smart phone verification is success, the allowanceof being the interviewer is approved by the network interview system100.

The second sub-process includes step S201, step S202, step S205, stepS206, and step S207, as follows.

-   step S201: receiving a request from at least one network user    desiring to be the at least one interviewer;-   step S202: determining if the member account of the at least one    network user is activated through a social network;-   step S205: receiving a request data of the at least one network    user;-   step S206: verifying correction and validity of request data of the    at least one network user; and-   step S207: when the at least one network user in the social network    satisfies a predetermined rule, allowing the request from at least    one network user desiring to be the at least one interviewer.

In the second sub-process, the network user desired to be theinterviewer has to send a request to network interview system 100. Instep S201, the network interview system 100 receives the request from atleast one network user desiring to be the at least one interviewer. Thenetwork interview system 100 then determines if the member account ofthe at least one network user is activated through social network instep S202. If the member account is activated without using a socialnetwork, the network interview system 100 receives a request data of theat least one network user in step S205. Then, the network interviewsystem 100 verifies correction and validity of request data of at leastone network user in step S206. After the request data is successfullyverified (or satisfies a predetermined check rules) through step S205and step S206, the network interview system 100 allows the request fromthe at least one network user desiring to be the at least oneinterviewer. In addition, to ensure the authenticity of the useraccount, the network interview system 100 can further verify acorrection and validity by sending a short message to the smart phone ofapplicants. If the smart phone verification is successful, the allowanceof being the interviewer is approved by the network interview system100. For example, the network user has the experience of being areporter. When the network user desires to be the interviewer, thenetwork user can show a press card. Then, the network interview system100 verifies the correction and validity of press card. The press cardis regarded as supporting information to facilitate the election ofinterviewer by the questioner.

FIG. 4 illustrates the flow chart of a grading evaluation processaccording to an embodiment of the present invention. After the at leastone interviewer transmits a response data of the interview to thenetwork according to step S106 in FIG. 2, the network users proceed witha grading evaluation process with respect to the interview. The gradingevaluation process includes the following steps.

-   step S301: the plurality of network users who support the question    set proceeding with a grading evaluation process according to the    response data of the interview after receiving the response data of    the interview; and-   step S302: providing a corresponding interviewed capability grade to    the at least one interviewer according to a grading evaluation    result.

After the at least one interviewer transmits a response data of theinterview to the network, all network users can receive the data of theinterview. However, in step S301, the network interview system 100provides at least one grading evaluation mechanism which is only beingoperated by the plurality of network users who support the question set.In other words, the plurality of network users who support the questionset proceeds with the grading evaluation process according to theresponse data of the interview after receiving the response data of theinterview. Specifically, the limitation in step S301 is used (i.e., onlyusers who support the question set) to maintain the fairness andobjectivity of grading evaluation process. For example, if the gradingevaluation process can be operated by all network users, some networkusers who oppose the question set may disturb the evaluation result bygrading a very low score, while losing objectivity of the gradingevaluation process. As a result, although the interview is satisfactory,it still has a risk to get low average score. To solve this problem, thelimitation in step S301 is introduced to avoid the opposition which isargued by the antagonistic network users. By doing so, the result of thegrading evaluation process can indicate the capability of interviewer orperformance of interview with high objectivity. Although the networkusers who support the question set proceed to the grading evaluationprocess in the embodiment, the present invention is not limited thereto.For example, the grading evaluation process can be operated by allnetwork users (i.e., including supported users and opposing users) inorder to analyze the impacted degree of the interviewed result for allnetwork users in other embodiments. In this case, the network interviewsystem 100 can perform in-depth analysis and may provide an accuratescore with respect to the capability of interviewer or performance ofinterview. In the following step S302, the network interview system 100provides a corresponding interviewed capability grade (score) to the atleast one interviewer according to a grading evaluation result. Suchscore affects the qualification calculation in step S104 for selectingat least one qualified interviewer to conduct the interview. Forexample, the status of the question set is changed to one which can beused in an interview and the questioner constraints the qualification ofinterviewer capability by a lower bound score equal to 5. By doing so,the network interview system 100 gives interviewers having score greaterthan the right to conduct the interview in step S104. Thus, theflexibility and reliability of interview can be improved by the gradingevaluation process. For another example, the questioner constraints thequalification of interviewer capability by a lower bound score equal to0. By doing so, the network interview system 100 gives interviewershaving score greater than 0 the right to conduct the interview in stepS104. Besides, the grading score of interviewed capability can befurther categorized to various professional fields. For example, eachinterviewer has five types of scores corresponding to five professionalfields. The questioner can choose the interviewer according to aspecific score type corresponding to a specific professional field. Byapplying various types of scores corresponding to various professionalfields, the reliability of interviewed quality can be further improved.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of another network interview system 200according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 5,the structure of network interview system 200 is similar to thestructure of network interview system 100. The difference is that thenetwork interview system 200 includes an advertisement service interface14 coupled to a network server 10. The function of advertisement serviceinterface 14 is expressed below. After the at least one interviewertransmits a response data of the interview to the network interviewsystem 200 according to the step S106 in FIG. 2, the network server 10receives the response data of interview and enables the advertisementservice interface 14 to activate a count of number of views. In theembodiment, the number of views is defined as the value of any datameasurement, such as click through rate or value of popularity. Then,the network interview system 200 gives the profit to at least oneinterviewer and/or questioner according to the number of views countedby the advertisement service interface 14. The steps of profitallocation are illustrated below.

FIG. 6 illustrates the flow chart of profit allocation in FIG. 5according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 6,step S401 to step S403 are introduced to achieve the profit allocation.The detailed illustration of step S401 to step S403 can be written asfollows.

-   step S401: the advertisement service interface 14 starting to    display the advertisement and activating a count of number of views    of question set provided by the questioner;-   step S402: calculating profit points of the at least one interviewer    and/or questioner according to the number of views of the question    set; and-   step S403: giving an appropriate profit to at least one interviewer    and/or questioner according to the profit points.

In step S401, after the at least one interviewer transmits a responsedata of the interview to the network according to the step S106 in FIG.2, the advertisement service interface 14 starts to display theadvertisement and activates a count of number of views of the questionset provided by the questioner. Then, the network interview system 200calculates profit points of at least one interviewer and/or questioneraccording to the number of views of the question set provided by theadvertisement service interface 14. In the embodiment, the calculationof profit points is not limited by using a specific equation orfunction. For example, the network interview system 200 may give oneprofit point to the at least one interviewer and/or questioner when themajority of network users satisfy the quality of interview. After theprofit points of the at least one interviewer and/or questioner arecalculated, the network interview system 200 gives an appropriate profitto at least one interviewer and/or questioner according to the profitpoints in step S403. Thus, the total profit produced by theadvertisement service interface 14 is allocated to the at least oneinterviewer and/or questioner by step S401 to step S403. By doing so,the at least one interviewer and/or questioner can get appropriatereward.

To make an in-depth interview with a specific topic of discussion, amethod of continuous discussion with a specific topic is introduced inthe network interview. FIG. 7 illustrates the flow chart of anothernetwork interview method (i.e., continuous discussion with a specifictopic) according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 7,the network interview method includes 8 steps, as step S501 to stepS508, as

-   step S501: a questioner receiving a response data of the interview    from the network;-   step S502: an original questioner or other network user providing a    new question set according to the response data of the interview;-   step S503: the original questioner or other network user publishing    the new question set to the network in order to collect the support    from a plurality of network users;-   step S504: when the new question set receives the support over a    predetermined number of network users, changing a status of the new    question set to one which can be used in an interview;-   step S505: giving at least one qualified interviewer the right to    conduct the interview;-   step S506: the at least one interviewer asking the at least one    designated interviewee or covering the at least one designated event    according to a plurality of questions listed in the new question    set;-   step S507: the at least one interviewer transmitting a response data    of the interview to the network; and-   step S508: the questioner receiving the response data of the    interview from the network.

In the embodiment, the function of step S501 can be regarded as thefunction of step S107 in FIG. 2. The functions of step S502 to step S508can be regarded as the functions of subsequent steps of S107 in FIG. 2.In the embodiment in FIG. 2, the questioner provides the question set.The interviewer asks the interviewee according to the question set.Finally, the questioner receives the response data of the interview.However, if the original questioner or other network user still has somequestions, the original questioner or other network user provides a newquestion set according to the response data of the interview in stepS502. Similarly, in the embodiment, the new question set associates toat least one designated interviewee and/or at least one designatedevent. The following step S503 to step S508 are similar to step S102 tostep S107. Thus, they are omitted here. Unlike the conventional networkinterview with one-time discussion of a specific topic, a continuousdiscussion of a specific topic is introduced in the embodiment of FIG.7. By continuously republishing the new question set by the originalquestioner or other network user, the reliability, accuracy,professionalism, and fluency can be improved. Specifically, the methodof continuous discussion with a specific topic is not limited by usingstep S501 to step S508. The method can be performed by a repeated steploop. For example, after performing step S508, the network interviewsystem goes back to perform step S501 until no new question set is beingprovided. To further increase the reliability and popularity of networkinterview, some additional steps are introduced to the embodiment of thepresent invention. FIG. 8 illustrates the flow chart of a method forimproving the reliability of the interview according to an embodiment ofthe present invention. As shown in FIG. 8, 3 steps are introduced forimproving the reliability of the interview, as follows.

-   step S601: the at least one interviewer viewing the question set    provided from the questioner after the question set is uploaded to    the network by the questioner;-   step S602: the plurality of network users who support the question    set paying a sponsorship fund for the right of the interview related    to the question set; and-   step S603: when the at least one interviewer successfully completes    the interview, the at least one interviewer acquires the sponsorship    fund.

In step S601 to step S603, network users of the network interview systemcan freely pay the sponsorship fund for the right of the interviewrelated to the question set. Thus, with the accumulation of thesponsorship fund, at least one professional interviewer is attracted tothe interview. Further, the more the sponsorship fund is accumulated,the more resources of interview can be used. By doing so, thereliability of the interview can be further improved.

FIG. 9 illustrates the flow chart of another method for improving thereliability of the interview according to the present invention. Asshown in FIG. 9, 6 steps are introduced for improving the reliability ofthe interview, as follows.

-   step S701: the at least one interviewer viewing the question set    provided from the questioner after the question set is uploaded to    the network by the questioner;-   step S702: the at least one interviewer sending a sponsorship fund    requirement corresponding to the right of the interview related to    the question set;-   step S703: the plurality of network users who support the question    set paying a sponsorship fund for the right of the interview related    to the question set;-   step S704: the at least one interviewer accessing and confirming the    sponsorship fund of the interview related to the question set;-   step S705: the at least one interviewer proceeding with the    interview according to the question set; and-   step S706: when the at least one interviewer successfully completes    the interview, the at least one interviewer acquires the sponsorship    fund.

In step S701, the at least one interviewer views the question setprovided from the questioner. Specifically, step S701 can be performedafter step S102 in FIG. 2. In other words, after the question set isuploaded to the network by the questioner (i.e., step S102), the atleast one interviewer views the question set provided from thequestioner (i.e., step S701). The interview may require numerousresources to be performed according to the question set. For example,the questioner wants to know the ecology of polar bears and provides theassociated question set. The at least one interviewer sends thesponsorship fund requirement corresponding to the right of the interviewrelated to the question set in step S702. Particularly, manyinterviewers may apply for the right of the interview related to thequestion set. The interview costs calculated by different interviewerare also different. Thus, every interviewer desiring to get the right ofthe interview can request the interview cost in forms of the sponsorshipfund requirement. In step S703, the plurality of network users whosupport the question set pay the sponsorship fund for the right of theinterview related to the question set. Then, the at least oneinterviewer accesses and confirms the sponsorship fund of the interviewrelated to the question set in step S704. Specifically, when thesponsorship fund reaches the interview cost calculated by theinterviewer, the interview can be started. The at least one interviewer(i.e., who has enough sponsorship fund) proceeds with the interviewaccording to the question set in step S705. On the contrary, when thesponsorship fund does not reach to the interview cost calculated by theinterviewer, the interviewer can still proceed with the interview or cantransfer the right of the interview to another interviewer whichproceeds with the interview with lower interview cost. When the at leastone interviewer successfully completes the interview, the at least oneinterviewer acquires the sponsorship fund in step S706. By doing so, thesuccess rate for forming and proceeding with the interview can beincreased. If the interviewer is professional and has a good reputation,the sponsorship fund of the interview would be increased so that thequality and reliability of interview can be further improved.

To sum up, the present invention illustrates a network interview systemand interview method. The idea is to use the operation of questionerpublishing the question set to a network. By collecting the support froma plurality of network users, the question set has a chance to apply tothe network interview. Instead of an election process used to choose aquestion set in the conventional network interview system, the method ofnetwork interview in the present invention can avoid the disturbancecaused by some network users who oppose the arguments of the questionset. Further, a grading evaluation process, a continuous discussionmethod, and a sponsorship fund mechanism can also be used with thenetwork interview. As a result, the present invention conducts anin-depth network interview in conjunction with high reliability,accuracy, professionalism, and fluency.

Those skilled in the art will readily observe that numerousmodifications and alterations of the device and method may be made whileretaining the teachings of the invention. Accordingly, the abovedisclosure should be construed as limited only by the metes and boundsof the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of performing a network interviewcomprising: a questioner providing a question set associating to atleast one designated interviewee and/or at least one designated event;the questioner publishing the question set to a network in order tocollect the support from a plurality of network users; when the questionset receives the support over a predetermined number of network users,changing a status of the question set to one which can be used in aninterview; giving at least one qualified interviewer the right toconduct the interview; the at least one interviewer asking the at leastone designated interviewee or covering the at least one designated eventaccording to a plurality of questions listed in the question set; the atleast one interviewer transmitting a response data of the interview tothe network; and the questioner receiving the response data of theinterview from the network.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the atleast one interviewer transmitting the responses of the interview to thenetwork, is that the at least one interviewer transmitting the responsesof the interview to the network after passing a user authenticationprocess.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: the plurality ofnetwork users who support the question set proceeding with a gradingevaluation process according to the response data of the interview afterreceiving the response data of the interview; and providing acorresponding interviewed capability grade to the at least oneinterviewer according to a grading evaluation result.
 4. The method ofclaim 1, wherein giving the at least one qualified interviewer the rightto conduct the interview, is giving at least one interviewer satisfyinga predetermined interviewed capability grade the right to conduct theinterview.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: the pluralityof network users viewing the question set provided from the questionerafter the question set being uploaded to the network by the questioner;the plurality of network users who support the question set paying asponsorship fund to the right of the interview related to the questionset; and when the at least one interviewer successfully completing theinterview, the at least one interviewer acquiring the sponsorship fund.6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: the at least oneinterviewer viewing the question set provided from the questioner afterthe question set being uploaded to the network by the questioner; the atleast one interviewer sending a sponsorship fund requirementcorresponding to the right of the interview related to the question set;the plurality of network users who support the question set paying asponsorship fund to the right of the interview related to the questionset; and when the at least one interviewer successfully completing theinterview, the at least one interviewer acquiring the sponsorship fund.7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving a request fromat least one network user desired to be the at least one interviewer. 8.The method of claim 7, wherein receiving a request from at least onenetwork user desired to be the at least one interviewer comprises : whenthe at least one network user sends a request by using a social network,verifying a correction and validity of user identity of the at least onenetwork user in the social network; and when the correction and validityof user identity of the at least one network user in the social networksatisfies a predetermined rule, allowing the request from at least onenetwork user desired to be the at least one interviewer.
 9. The methodof claim 7, wherein receiving a request from at least one network userdesired to be the at least one interviewer comprises: when the at leastone network user sends the request without using a social network,verifying a request data of the at least one network user; and when therequest data satisfies a predetermined qualification, allowing therequest from at least one network user desired to be the at least oneinterviewer.
 10. The method of claim 7, wherein receiving a request fromat least one network user desired to be the at least one interviewercomprises: when the at least one network user sends the request withoutusing a social network, verifying a request data of the at least onenetwork user; verifying a correction of user identity of the at leastone network user; and when the request data satisfies a predeterminedqualification and the user identity is verified, allowing the requestfrom at least one network user desired to be the at least oneinterviewer.
 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising: when thequestioner transmits the question set to a network, activating a countof number of views by an advertisement service interface.
 12. The methodof claim 11, further comprising: calculating profit points of thequestioner according to the number of views of the question set.
 13. Themethod of claim 11, further comprising: calculating profit points of theat least one interviewer according to the number of views of thequestion set.
 14. A network interview system comprising: a questionerinterface for transmitting a question set associating to at least onedesignated interviewee and/or at least one designated event providedfrom a questioner; an interviewer interface for transmitting data of atleast one interviewer; a database for saving data; and a network serverconnected to the questioner interface, the interviewer interface, andthe database; wherein the questioner provides the question set to thenetwork server through the questioner interface, the network serversaves the question set to the database and publishes the question set toa network in order to collect the support from a plurality of networkusers, when the question set receives the support over a predeterminednumber of network users, the network server changes the status of thequestion set to one which can be used in an interview, at least onequalified interviewer is given the right to conduct the interview, theat least one interviewer asks the at least one designated interviewee orcovering the at least one designated event according to a plurality ofquestions listed in the question set, the at least one interviewertransmits a response data of the interview to the network server, thenetwork server saves the response data of the interview to the database,and the network server transmits the response data of the interview tothe questioner through the questioner interface.